Policy & Resources Committee
|
Agenda Item 56
Brighton & Hove City Council |
AGENDA ITEM
KING ALFRED REDEVELOPMENT
GREEN GROUP AMENDMENT
That where the recommendations are listed to add the following as
shown in bold italics:
2.1 Note Crest’s withdrawal from the King Alfred Development project.
2.2 Agrees that the procurement should be closed, that the current project should be ended and that the Council should serve a notice under Regulation 55 of the Public Contracts Regulations 2015 confirming that the Council will not be awarding a contract.
2.3 Confirms that provision of a modern Sports Centre in the west of the city remains a Council priority and agrees that new plans should be formulated.
2.4 Notes the outline of key
activities proposed as part of the next stage to establish the new
project; and seeks to
- establish new delivery methods for key aspects of the scheme,
including: the exploration of multi-site approaches; reaffirmation
of developing elements of the scheme ‘in-house’; public
transport infrastructure connectivity for residents
2.5 Agrees to the establishment of a new cross-party Project Board to oversee the new project; notes that the membership of the Board will be on the basis of nominations from each political group; and notes that terms of reference will be brought to a future meeting of this Committee for approval.
2.6 Agrees that a detailed report
with proposals for the way forward, including project
delivery timescales for the next five years be brought to a
future meeting of this Committee.
Proposed by: Cllr Mac
Cafferty
Seconded by: Cllr Gibson
Recommendations if carried to read: |
2.1 Note Crest’s withdrawal from the King Alfred Development project.
2.2 Agrees that the procurement should be closed, that the current project should be ended and that the Council should serve a notice under Regulation 55 of the Public Contracts Regulations 2015 confirming that the Council will not be awarding a contract.
2.3 Confirms that provision of a modern Sports Centre in the west of the city remains a Council priority and agrees that new plans should be formulated.
2.4 Notes the outline of key
activities proposed as part of the next stage to establish the new
project; and seeks to 2.5 Agrees to the establishment of a new cross-party Project Board to oversee the new project; notes that the membership of the Board will be on the basis of nominations from each political group; and notes that terms of reference will be brought to a future meeting of this Committee for approval.
2.6 Agrees that a
detailed report with proposals for the way forward, including
project delivery timescales for the next five years be brought to a
future meeting of this Committee. |